昕雨

今天....老師上課 突然提到這件事
說美菲有協防條約...就算想開打也不可能 菲在落後也有美在後面
被佔領的那七個小島 也不曉得什麼時候能拿回來....
P.S 家裡有菲傭菲勞的..別拿球棒去打他....這樣還要賠他們錢捏 更何況確實跟他們是沒啥關係

老師很可愛-.- 說現在再抗議的都是老弱 青壯年都跑去捕黑鮪魚XD
說今年跑那麼遠 一定鮪魚會豐收阿  哈哈哈XDDD

昕雨

回复 37# azimao

那時候駐軍在台海是特事特辦(因台海危機)的中美共同防禦條約(應說此條約一直存在 但是前年美國哪個官員說 已不干涉)  美菲是後來九五一年八月三十日簽訂美菲共同防禦條約

----------------------------------------------------
老實說....沒有這次的危機 我不會知道我有多無能

補充 美菲協防條約：第四條第五條
第四條
任一方皆承認：對任一方太平洋區域之武裝攻擊，將危及另一方自身和平與安全；任一方並聲明將基於各自憲法之程序應付此共同危險。
任何此類武裝攻擊，以及武裝攻擊後之任何手段，應立即回報聯合國安理會。在安理會採取必要措施以回復或維持國際和平與安全之後，前述手段應終止。

ARTICLE IV.
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack in the Pacific area on either of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common dangers in accordance with its constitutional processes.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall be immediately reported to the Security Council of the United Nations.  Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.

第五條
為第四條之目的，對任一方之武裝攻擊視為包括對於任一方國內領土，或對於其管轄下之太平洋島嶼領土之武裝攻擊，以及對於在太平洋之武裝軍隊、公用船舶與飛行器之武裝攻擊。

ARTICLE V.
For purposes of ARTICLE IV, an armed attack on either of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack on the metropolitan territory of either of the Parties, or on the island territories under its jurisdiction in the Pacific Ocean, its armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the Pacific.